Comparison · read on October 27, 2026
Gradium TTS vs Deepdub PhantomZ 4.0
Two text-to-speech (TTS) models side by side, from four public benchmarks. Speed comes first, then listener rating and price; the three are never added into a score.
| Measure | Gradium TTS | Deepdub PhantomZ 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Gradium | Deepdub |
| Speed tier | Headroom | Visible delay |
| P95 time to first audio | 104.3 ms | 430 ms |
| Median time to first audio | 53.7 ms | 183.4 ms |
| Listener Elo | 1,174 | Not rated |
| Price per 1M characters | $36 to $57.8 | Not collected |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Rank in the full ranking | 2 | 20 |
| Rank by use case | Customer service 1, Voice agents 2, Assistants 1, Entertainment 1, Knowledge sharing 1 | None |
Which should you choose?
- Speed: Gradium TTS comes out ahead (104.3 ms against 430 ms at P95).
- Listener rating: not compared, because a benchmark in this index does not publish it for both models.
- Price: not compared, because a benchmark in this index does not publish it for both models.
Where a model is not timed or not rated, nothing is estimated. See each model page for its sources: Gradium TTS and Deepdub PhantomZ 4.0.
Frequently asked questions
- Which is faster, Gradium TTS or Deepdub PhantomZ 4.0?
- Speed: Gradium TTS comes out ahead (104.3 ms against 430 ms at P95).
- Which is rated higher by listeners, Gradium TTS or Deepdub PhantomZ 4.0?
- Listener rating: not compared, because a benchmark in this index does not publish it for both models.
- Which is cheaper, Gradium TTS or Deepdub PhantomZ 4.0?
- Price: not compared, because a benchmark in this index does not publish it for both models.
- Why is this model always on the left?
- Gradium TTS is the reference model of this site's comparison pages: it is set against every other listed model. The editor chose it; it is not chosen by rank.