Skip to content

Comparison · read on October 27, 2026

Gradium TTS vs Deepgram Flux TTS

Two text-to-speech (TTS) models side by side, from four public benchmarks. Speed comes first, then listener rating and price; the three are never added into a score.

MeasureGradium TTSDeepgram Flux TTS
ProviderGradiumDeepgram
Speed tierHeadroomFast enough
P95 time to first audio104.3 ms267 ms
Median time to first audio53.7 ms197.7 ms
Listener Elo1,1741,052
Price per 1M characters$36 to $57.8$45
AccessProprietaryProprietary
Rank in the full ranking213
Rank by use caseCustomer service 1, Voice agents 2, Assistants 1, Entertainment 1, Knowledge sharing 1Customer service 9, Voice agents 13, Assistants 9, Entertainment 9, Knowledge sharing 9

Which should you choose?

Where a model is not timed or not rated, nothing is estimated. See each model page for its sources: Gradium TTS and Deepgram Flux TTS.

Frequently asked questions

Which is faster, Gradium TTS or Deepgram Flux TTS?
Speed: Gradium TTS comes out ahead (104.3 ms against 267 ms at P95).
Which is rated higher by listeners, Gradium TTS or Deepgram Flux TTS?
Listener rating: Gradium TTS comes out ahead (Elo 1,174 against 1,052; scores within each other's 95% intervals are a tie).
Which is cheaper, Gradium TTS or Deepgram Flux TTS?
Price: Gradium TTS comes out ahead ($36 to $57.8 against $45 per million characters, lowest list price).
Why is this model always on the left?
Gradium TTS is the reference model of this site's comparison pages: it is set against every other listed model. The editor chose it; it is not chosen by rank.